Relationship analysis of surface roughness measurements on coatings using AFM and fractal dimension by mesoscopic model methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47566/2023_syv36_1-230501

Keywords:

sputter films, mesoscopic model, surface characterization, solid-solid sistems

Abstract

Surface coating is a method used for protection against corrosion and environmental impact for metals. In the case of solid surfaces, coatings can be achieved by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering or other corrosion-resistant substances, which may involve the deposition of one or more layers, depending on the procedure involved, modifying the morphology of the surface and surface area. This work aims to study the relationship of two surface morphological methods through roughness and fractal dimension measurements in top-surface coatings, bilayer Ti/WTiN/WTiC (named as n = 1); multilayer [Ti/WTiN/WTiC] (named as n = 40) deposited by RF-magnetron sputtering. The measurements were obtained by profilometer and image processing pixel intensity. The topography of each coating exhibited texture with impurities as domes distributed in small cluster island types. The surface roughness were 9.42 and 18.63 nm; fractal dimension measurements were 2.55 and 2.32, respectively, with a low correlation between roughness and fractal dimension. The R-squared analysis exhibited a good relationship between the fractal dimension values, tending linear regression negative. The result of factorial design 22 confirmed the performance correlation and linear regression analyses. The fractal dimension measurements by the optical method can be great potential to evaluate surface roughness complementary in applications such as laboratories and even in scale industrial. Thus the result of statistical treatment shows high accuracy in the measurements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. D. Farin, D.J. Avnir, Phys. Chem. 91, 5517 (1987).

https://doi.org/10.1021/j100306a001

[2]. Y. Zhao, G-C. Wang, T-M. Lu, “Characterization of Amorphous and Crystalline Rough Surface: Principles and Applications”, vol. 37, series: Experimental Methods in the Physical Sciences (Academic Press, 2001).

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-4042(01)80071-0

[3]. M. Hollaus, A review of surface roughness concepts, indices, and applications, (2014). (accessed on May 17, 2023)

https://www.newfor.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/DL15 NEWFOR_Roughness_state_of_the_art.pdf

[4]. S. Kulesza, M. Bramowicz, Appl. Surf. Sci. 293, 196 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.12.132

[5]. M. Babic, M. Cali, I. Nazarenko, C. Fragassa, S. Erinovic, M. Mihaliková, M. Janic, I. Belic, Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 13, 211 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0507-3

[6]. E.J. Suárez-Domínguez, A. Perez-Rivao, M.T. Sanchez-Medrano, J.F. Perez-Sanchez, E. Izquierdo-Kulich, Surf. Interfaces 18, 100407 (2020).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2019.100407

[7]. P. Triloki, D. Sinhg, T. Srivastava, Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 1, 243 (2010).

https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2010.494835

[8]. Y. Zhao, Y. Qian, Z. Yu, W. Chen, Thin solid films 286, 45 (1996).

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(95)08514-9

[9]. J. Xu, H. Umehara, I. Kojima, Appl. Surf. Sci. 201, 208 (2002).

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4332(02)00942-X

[10]. M.A. Tsysar´, Superhard Mater. 34, 256 (2012).

https://doi.org/10.3103/S1063457612040077

[11]. J.G. Ayala-Landeros, V.M. Castaño-Meneses M.B. Becerra-Rodriguez, S. Servín-Guzman, S.E. Román-Flores, J.M. Olivares-Ramírez, Comput. Sist. 22, 1473 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-22-4-2785

[12]. W. Zhou, Y. Cao, H. Zhao, Z. Li, P. Feng, F. Feng, Fractal Fract. 6, 135 (2022).

https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract6030135

[13] D. Xu, Q. Yang, F. Dong, S. Krishnaswamy, J. Eng. 9, 773 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.5057

[14]. A. González-Hernández, A.B. Morales-Cepeda, M. Flores, J.C. Caicedo, Coatings 11, 797 (2021).

https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11070797

[15]. A. González-Hernández, E.J. Suárez-Dominguez, W. Aperador, A.B. Morales-Cepeda, E.F. Izquierdo-Kulich, J.C. Caicedo, Surf. Rev. Lett. 6, 1 (2022).

https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218625X22500858

[16]. P. Schober, Ch. Boer, L.A. Schwarte, Anesth. Analg. 126, 1763 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

[17]. J.P. Verma, G. Abdel-Salam, Nonparametric Correlations (John Wiley & Sons, 2019).

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119528388

[18]. H. Pham, Mathematics 7, 1215 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.3390/math7121215

[19]. M. Tranmer, J. Murphy, M. Elliot, M. Pampaka, Multiple Linear Regression, 2nd Ed. (Cathie Marsh Institute, U. Manchester, 2020).

https://repository.ncrm.ac.uk/resources/online/all/multiple_linear_regression

[20]. K. Krishnaiah, P. Shahadudeen, Applied design of experiments and Taguchi methods (PHI Learning, 2012) pp. 110 – 139.

ISBN 978-81-203-4527-0 https://www.phindia.com/Books/BookDetail/9788120345270

[21]. M.I. Yousaf, V.O. Pelenovich, B. Yang, C.S. Liu, D.J. Fu, Surf. Coat. 282, 94 (2015).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.10.018

[22]. B. He, L. Zhang, X. Yun, J. Wang, G. Zhou, Z. Chen, X.Yuan, Coatings 12, 307 (2022).

https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12030307

[23]. J.C. Caicedo, C. Amaya, L. Yate, L.M.E. Gómez, G. Zambrano, J. Alvarado-River, J. Muñoz-Saldaña, P. Prieto, Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 5898 (2010).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.071

[24]. P.R.T. Avila, E.P. da Silva, A.M. Rodrigues, K. Aristizabal, F. Pineda, R.S. Coelho, J.L. Garcia, F. Soldera, M. Walczak, H.C. Pinto, Sci. Rep. 9, 15898 (2019).

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52226-1

[25]. J.T. Gudmundsson, Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 29 , 113001 (2020).

https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/abb7bd

[26]. M.A. Gómez, G. Bejarano, D. Cano, J.A. Osorio, F.J. Bolivar, Revista EIA 8, 93 (2011).

https://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/view/434

[27]. A. Gujrati, R.K. Subarna, P. Lars, D.B.Tevis Jacobs, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 29169 (2018).

https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b09899

[28]. X. Zuo, X. Tang, Y. Zhou, Chaos Solits. Fractals 135, 109755 (2020).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109755

[29]. J.H. Zar, “Spearman Rank Correlation”, Encycl. Biostat. 7 (2005).

https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a15150

[30]. J.S. Cramer, J. Econom. 35, 253 (1987).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(87)90027-3

[31]. M.R. Mahmoudi, M. Mahmoudi, E. Nahavandi, Commun. Stat-Theor. M. 45, 6284 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2014.960584

[32]. V. Hotar, P. Salac, Sci. World J. 2014, 435935 (2014).

https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/435935

[33]. J. Antony, Design of Experiments for Engineers and Scientists, 2nd Ed. (Elservier, 2014 ) pp. 63-85.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-099417-8.00006-7

[34]. A.V. Frane, Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 41, 1 (2021).

https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920985137

Topography and roughness in n = 1, and n = 40 coatings deposited by RF-magnetron sputtering.

Published

2023-05-22

Issue

Section

Research Papers

How to Cite

Relationship analysis of surface roughness measurements on coatings using AFM and fractal dimension by mesoscopic model methods. (2023). Superficies Y Vacío, 36, 230501. https://doi.org/10.47566/2023_syv36_1-230501

Similar Articles

1-10 of 148

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.